Graffiti is the truest form of art because it is neither created for critical acclaim nor for monetary gain? - bathroom art
An artist once quoted to me (found this in the toilets of the architecture) and has since been hard for me. It seems reasonable, but I wonder what others think artists on this budget?
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Bathroom Art Graffiti Is The Truest Form Of Art Because It Is Neither Created For Critical Acclaim Nor For Monetary Gain?
3 comments:
I like the quote, but --
I think it is something like "in the true art."
Simply because - is an art.
It is not art supposed to be different for each person?
And say this, I assume people are in agreement with the offer, while others may dismiss as meaningless.
By the way, I like graffiti - not so much the labels, more fun or inspiring thought of little things, we found that raised on the streets or the lovely scrawled on a wall.
Interesting question. However, graffiti is often done to build a good reputation. They believe that it is better if you throw a good song and some artists to build a good reputation for their work. So the question is, who claim that they are not made graffiti by acclamation.
But I wonder what "real" art? If someone is not paid for their art "art" real? The famous Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci was commissioned a work of art (that is, he was paid,) to do so. Most people think that the Mona Lisa as an art.
I would say that "true art" is defined by the quality of art ... if the artist has gained a good reputation / fame or money.
Since this quote is from a man who has no representative or money for me. ;)
Performance-mentioned reasons (which are excellent!), Best describes me. Because I believe that the use of (only) is his own body as an artist, ultimately, the true art. I mean, does not use any tools or materials. also: the true form of art has to exist, but at the time. I know most people think that art should be timeless and eternal, but not me. You need to strengthen the efforts here and now.
Post a Comment